Clean Water Advocacy -
Preparation of Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Reports
Recommendations for Clean Water Act §303(d) and §305(b) Methodologies and Reporting
Under current federal rules, States must submit their Clean Water Act §303(d) lists of impaired waters, as well as the methodologies used to prepare them, by October 1, 2002. On November 19, 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a guidance document (called the "EPA Listing Guidance"), which recommends that States combine the §303(d) list with the required §305(b) report into one Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (or "Integrated Report').
The EPA Listing Guidance, however, is very general, and does not specifically address a number of details that States will face when revising their listing methodologies and developing their 2002 and subsequent Integrated Reports. AMSA worked with the Federal Water Quality Coalition and the American Farm Bureau Federation to develop this document to address some of those details and to provide sound, science-based recommendations for States to use during the listing process. The recommendations are grouped into the following categories of issues:
- Pre-Listing Evaluation of Water Quality Standards
- Collection of Data and Information
- Evaluation of Existing Data and Information
- Development of Integrated Reports
- Delisting Procedures
Each category includes a discussion of the requirements of the current federal rules and the EPA Listing Guidance, and recommendations on how States can best implement the requirements in a scientifically sound, legally defensible manner. Where States have already addressed some of these issues, examples from those State rules and methodologies are also included.
Exibits:
- Final Listing Ducument (PDF ~679 KB)
- Exibit 1 - EPA's current TMDL rule (PDF ~87 KB)
- Exibit 2 - EPA's 2002 listing guidance (PDF ~173 KB)
- Exibit 3 - Arizona methodology (PDF ~137 KB)
- Exibit 4 - Colorado methodology (PDF ~25 KB)
- Exibit 5 - Florida methodology (PDF ~174 KB)
- Exibit 6 - Missouri methodology (PDF ~68 KB)
- Exibit 7 - Montana methodology (PDF ~137 KB)
- Exibit 8 - Nebraska methodology (PDF ~168 KB)
- Exibit 9 - North Carolina methodology (PDF ~7,448 KB)
- Exibit 10 - Texas methodology (PDF ~446 KB)
- Exibit 11 - Virginia methodology (PDF ~1,468 KB)
For these downloadable files, you must have the Acrobat Reader. If you don't have the Acrobat Reader, click on the icon below to download a copy. After you download and install a copy, return to this page and click on the links above for the downloadable files.
