Search

Clean Water Advocacy Newsroom

Clean Water Advocacy - Newsroom - AMSA in the News

No. 26
Thursday, February 7, 2002 Page A-4
ISSN 1521-9402
News

Security
Officials Responsible for Water, Sewers Respond to New Threats Posed by Terrorists

ORLANDO--Since the terrorist attacks Sept. 11, security concerns and how to pay to address them have dominated the challenges faced by drinking water and wastewater officials.
Even before the attacks, a presidential directive was issued in 1998 to look into the protection of water and waste water utilities, Diane VanDe Hei, executive director of the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, said Feb. 6. At that time, cyber terrorism was the primary security concern, she said, despite assertions by utility managers that threats to the physical plant were equally problematic.
"That message is easier to get across now," VanDe Hei said, during the winter meeting of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, which focused on security issues.
In the wake of the attacks, Congress approved an emergency funding supplemental appropriation for fiscal year 2002 that provided about $80 million for drinking water vulnerability assessments. Further, the Bush administration included an additional $20 million in its fiscal 2003 budget request for the Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water security (24 DEN AA-1, 2/5/02).
However, AMSA officials said at the conference they were concerned that none of that money was specifically targeted toward security for publicly owned treatment works.
Janet Pawlukiewicz, director of EPA's water protection task force in the EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, told the conference that the agency is still deliberating on the use of the money from the supplemental appropriation and the budget request.
"I anticipate there will be some support for waste water," she said.
Former National Security Advisory Sandy Berger also addressed the conference and pointed out that most of the focus has been on the drinking water side.
"There needs to be a greater understanding that [threats to] waste water treatment may pose an even greater risk," he said. "We need more focus on that side of the equation."
An informal survey of publicly owned treatment works operators showed that most did not have adequate funding budgeted for security issues. Most said that after the attacks they were contacted by public officials or their governing boards seeking assurances that they were taking steps to protect their facility.

Protection for 'Crumbling' Infrastructure

Bill Bertera, executive director of the Water Environment Federation, an education and research organization affiliated with municipalities, said he found it ironic that utilities are starting to get funding to protect external infrastructure "that has been crumbling internally for 50 years."
He was referring to the campaign by municipal water and waste water utilities to secure more funding from Congress to address aging infrastructure. Organizations representing these groups estimate the funding needs for capital improvements and operation and maintenance over the next 20 years at up to $1 trillion.
"While physical infrastructure is important, it's not as sexy as cyber terrorism," he said.
Tools in the form of software and checklists have been developed by AMSA and other groups to help waste water utilities grapple with the security issues.
Kenneth Rubin, senior partner with PA Consulting Inc., in Washington, D.C., which helped develop a vulnerability assessment checklist for publicly owned treatment works, said that many of the new industry standards for security do not come from the water industry because they have not been considered targets for criminal or terrorist activity.
Instead, the standards have "come from high-risk facilities like nuclear power plants and airports," he said.
The checklist includes an assessment of the facility's assets and the security measures already in place. It helps facility managers to ascertain risk and to put plans in place to deal with those risks.

Information Sharing, Analysis System

In addition, AMWA has taken the lead on developing an Information Sharing and Analysis System for water and waste water utilities. VanDe Hei said she expects the system, which is a secure Internet-based communications tool that will include timely advisories and alerts, to be available in April.
"We want [the ISAC] to be able to take timely, credible, actionable information from the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies and get it out to utilities," she said. "We also want it to house sensitive information that we wouldn't want to put out on the Internet where anyone can see it. It needs to be a safe house."
Glenn Reinhardt, executive director of the Water Environment Research Federation, the research arm of WEF, outlined numerous research projects that will help in the protection of utilities.
Many of these new technologies to address security concerns may have the added benefit of helping facilities meet their regulatory obligations under the Clean Water Act in a more cost-effective way. While concerns about security abound, Reinhardt said, regulatory matters also remain.


By Susan Bruninga