Search

Clean Water Advocacy Newsroom

Clean Water Advocacy - Newsroom - AMSA in the News

No. 216
Friday, November 9, 2001 Page A-15
ISSN 1521-9402
News

Water Pollution
Permit Limits for Mercury Seen Increasing For Treatment Facilities, City Officials Say

NASHVILLE--More publicly owned treatment works are finding discharge limits on mercury incorporated into their Clean Water Act permits in what officials said Nov. 9 they expect to be an increasing trend.
Part of the reason for the increase is the methylmercury criterion issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in January, according to Chris Hornback, manager of governmental affairs for the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies.
He spoke at a pretreatment coordinators workshop sponsored by EPA and AMSA.
The first-ever water quality criterion for methylmercury takes the unusual step of considering concentrations of mercury in fish tissue to derive a residue criterion for methylmercury of 0.3 milligrams per kilogram of fish tissue (2 DEN A-1, 1/3/01). Criteria for other pollutants are usually set for the water itself, not for the fish in the water.
More states are looking at mercury limits as National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits come up for renewal, Hornback said. Another driver for mercury limits is the federal Great Lakes Initiative, which seeks to reduce pollution in the lakes with an emphasis on bioaccumulative pollutants such as mercury.
The permit limits pose a problem for POTWs, Hornback said, because few control options exist, leaving pollution prevention and best management practices as some of the only viable means of achieving the limits.

AMSA Report

AMSA issued a report in August 2000 showing that a significant amount of mercury in waste water comes from domestic sources (163 DEN A-10,8/22/00). Domestic waste water contains an average of 138 parts per trillion of mercury, the report, Evaluation of Domestic Sources of Mercury, said.
The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) was one of the earliest systems to have permit limits for mercury. The permit limited the amount of mercury that was allowed to pass through the facility to no more than 1.3 ppt.
Keith J. Linn, environmental specialist for the district, said that before the Great Lakes Initiative, Ohio set the water quality criteria for mercury at 12 ppt. After the adoption of the initiative in 1997, the water quality criterion dropped to 3.1 ppt, and that assumed a daily average consumption of fish of 15 grams per day, which Linn said is higher than the national average of 6.5 grams.
After this limit was set, the initiative moved forward with a water quality criterion designed to protect wildlife that consume fish. This criterion was set at 1.3 ppt, Linn said.
Sampling showed the mercury levels from domestic sources averaged about 85 ppt, Linn said. The 350 dental offices in the region accounted for another large portion of the mercury concentration.
Because of the high loading from domestic sources--estimated at about 0.17 pounds per day--the district calculated that the maximum allowable mercury loading from industry would have to be a negative number, Linn said.
The reason is because to achieve the permit limit of no mercury pass-through of greater than 1.3 ppt, the maximum allowable headworks loading would have to be 0.15 pounds per day. Subtract from that amount the 0.17 pounds from domestic sources, and the result is a maximum allowable mercury load for industry of negative 0.02 pounds, Linn said.
"Obviously, that poses a problem," he said.
Ohio EPA issued guidance stating that BMPs may be used to meet local industrial pretreatment limits, Scott Broski, supervisor of enforcement for the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, said. They may be used in cases where flows from industrial users are insufficient to obtain a good waste water sample, where the calculated numeric limit is below detection levels, or they can be shown to be the most economically feasible means of regulation.

Ohio Guidance

The Ohio EPA issued guidance in June 2000 on BMPs for industrial pretreatment limits. Such practices include substituting materials; reformulating or redesigning the product; modifying equipment, facilities, technologies, or processes; recycling scrap amalgam or using amalgam traps; and using alternatives to amalgam where possible.
The NEORSD proposed that some industrial sources submit BMP plans indicating how they will minimize their discharges of mercury. These plans include inventories of mercury sources and their loadings, identification and evaluation of BMPs, an implementation schedule, and methods for assuring progress.
Hornback said some states are considering legislation that could be troublesome for dischargers such as POTWs. For example, New York is considering a bill setting mercury discharge limits at below detection levels. Maine is considering a bill setting water quality criteria at 0.2 parts per trillion.
EPA approved Method 1631 in June 1999 that uses an atomic fluorescence technique that can detect mercury at levels of 0.5 parts per trillion. The method is about 200 times more sensitive than other detection methods, the agency said.
AMSA, he said, is working with the electric utility industry to study mercury, its sources, and how it acts in the water column.
"We also need to figure out the issue of legacy mercury," he said, speaking about baseline loadings of mercury in water.
Other studies are looking at equipment that removes amalgam in dental offices before it is introduced into the waste stream.


By Susan Bruninga