Search

Clean Water Advocacy Newsroom

Clean Water Advocacy - Newsroom - AMSA in the News

Bill includes boost for stormwater mitigation, urban planning
Brian Stempeck, Greenwire reporter

Reflecting a growing awareness in Congress of the environmental impacts of highway construction, the Senate added provisions to the nation's six-year, $255 billion highway bill to bolster stormwater runoff programs and metropolitan planning. But future clashes await on the Senate floor as lawmakers temporarily pocketed amendments on issues ranging from environmental streamlining to Clean Air Act conformity.

During yesterday's Environment and Public Works Committee markup, Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) offered an amendment that would dedicate 2 percent of Surface Transportation Program funding, approximately $1 billion, toward stormwater mitigation efforts.

Stormwater runoff is the leading cause of pollution in more than half of the country's rivers and streams, Warner said. While mitigation plans are required for new roads, more money needs to be spent to retrofit existing roads, he said.

States can already spend money for stormwater mitigation through their transportation enhancements accounts, used to fund a wide range of projects. But that means mitigation programs have to compete with popular programs like bike and pedestrian trails. "The competition for these dollars is so intense," said Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.), a supporter of the amendment.

Adam Krantz, managing director of government affairs for the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, applauded the funding increase for stormwater management. "Highway development has a direct link to water quality," Krantz said. "It's a demonstration that we're gong to be doing things in an environmentally aware manner."

The measure shows "a recognition of infrastructure needs that are exorbitant nationwide for the nation's municipalities," Krantz said, adding that without funding to deal specifically with runoff, utilities would have to pay for cleanup efforts out of already strapped accounts. "We think it's a good first step," he said

But opponents of the amendment argued that increasing mitigation spending would rob dollars for highway construction. "When we set another set-aside, we're taking money away from the specific purpose of this bill," said Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.). Committee staff estimated that stormwater mitigation would receive close to $958 million over the bill's six-year lifespan. The amendment passed on a 10-9 vote.

Stormwater mitigation is already eligible for funding under the transportation enhancements account, said Greg Cohen, vice president for government policy at the American Highway Users Alliance. "The needs regarding congestion and safety are far greater than the total amount of funding that we have," Cohen said. Setting aside a specific percentage of funding for mitigation means that states won't be able to set their own priorities, he said. "We were a little disappointed that it passed."

A second amendment, offered by Warner and Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), would provide about $850 million more funding for metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), groups that are responsible for transportation planning in urban regions of more than 50,000 people.

Currently, 1 percent of each state's core federal highway funding is dedicated to metropolitan planning. The original bill would have continued that trend, providing about $1.7 billion for metropolitan planning over the next six years. Warner and Graham's amendment, however, would increase the set-aside to 1.5 percent, upping the total planning allocation to about $2.55 billion.

Bond argued against that amendment as well, noting that MPOs will soon have less responsibility because some transportation planning procedures are simplified in the bill.

But Warner rejected that rationale. "My Virginia MPOs tell me these regulations nearly double their current responsibilities," he said. Furthermore, committee staffers said 36 new MPOs will be needed in the near future as smaller cities expand. The Warner-Graham amendment passed 12-7.

Jason Jordan, government affairs manager at the American Planning Association, said APA was "very pleased" with Warner's amendment. "Increasing PL funding has been one of our top priorities in reauthorization," Jordan said.

"The job we're expecting MPOs to do is increasingly complex," added Jordan. Among other things, MPO officials have to weigh demographic changes, air quality issues, increasing demand for civic participation and other issues.

Lawmakers often discuss ways to speed up the roadbuilding process, and APA believes that one of the best ways to expedite projects is to "invest in the planning up front," Jordan said.

The Warner-Graham amendment came on the heels of a recent Brookings Institution report that recommended Congress boost funding for MPOs and shift some decisionmaking power away from the state departments of transportation (Greenwire, Oct. 27).

Environmental issues saved for floor battle

Though EPW members on both sides filed dozens of amendments addressing environmental streamlining provisions in the bill, almost all opted to hold their amendments until the bill goes to the Senate floor, probably early next year.

Existing environmental laws guiding the construction of new roads and bridges "strike a good balance," said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). "The bill before us today changes that balance," she said, adding that the reauthorization legislation takes "several backward steps."

"I think we've gone overboard," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who held off on several amendments dealing with Clean Air Act provisions in the bill, professing a "deep concern" for the changes to conformity laws.

Environmentalists have criticized sections of the EPW bill they say undermine transportation conformity plans under the Clean Air Act. State officials use transportation plans to "demonstrate conformity," proving to the Transportation Department and the U.S. EPA that emissions from the transportation sector will not exceed allowable emissions under broader state air quality plans. If states fail to demonstrate conformity, they can only use federal funding for projects that will not adversely affect air quality, such as safety or mass transit programs.

A proposal from EPW Committee Chairman James Inhofe (R-Okla.) would shorten long-term transportation plans from 20 years to 10 years, with updates required every four years instead of every two years. The bill also allows state officials to move forward with projects during a conformity lapse, as long as they use nonfederal funds.

Other members said the streamlining provisions do not go far enough and pledged to improve upon them during floor debate. "I'm very disappointed with the proposal in this area," said Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio).

Voinovich withdrew nine amendments dealing with streamlining, including amendments to alter a mandate in current law that transportation planners avoid historic sites and other areas when building roads and bridges. "This process creates more delays in my state than anything else," Voinovich said.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) withdrew an amendment dealing with "early-action compacts," which allow communities currently in compliance with the existing one-hour ozone standard but expected to be in violation of the new eight-hour threshold to enter a special category outside of the implementation boundaries facing the rest of the country. Language regarding "early-action compacts" was in earlier drafts of the EPW bill, but not in the bill approved yesterday.

An amendment from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to focus the project development process on major requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act was defeated by voice vote.